How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Slovenia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Qatar

25.99 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Slovenia

26.73 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Qatar rank

40th

Slovenia rank

39th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Qatar
Slovenia

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 26.73 1000 USD per square kilometre against 25.99 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.74 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Qatar ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 39th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	10.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	28.43 1000 USD per square kilometre	18 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2000s	9.65 1000 USD per square kilometre	30.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	20.56 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2010s	16.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	26.43 1000 USD per square kilometre	9.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2020s	27.72 1000 USD per square kilometre	26.92 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7958 1000 USD per square kilometre	Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Qatar or Slovenia?: Slovenia, at 26.73 1000 USD per square kilometre against 25.99 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Qatar and Slovenia?: 0.74 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Slovenia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Qatar ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 39th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Slovenia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/qatar/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/qatar/slovenia/">Qatar vs Slovenia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.