New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

New Caledonia
0.7543 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5266 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
127th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.7543 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5266 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2277 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 135 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1406 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3169 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1763 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.181 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4748 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2937 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.3511 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.511 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1599 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.4265 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5585 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1321 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.6564 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4894 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.167 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.7811 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5083 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2727 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 0.7543 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5266 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.2277 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
New Caledonia ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.