Nepal vs Romania: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Nepal
20.14 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
21.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
50th
Romania rank
49th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Nepal
  • Romania
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 21.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 20.14 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Nepal ranks 50th and Romania ranks 49th of 135 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 3.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1970s 4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 27.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.44 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1980s 6.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.98 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1990s 7.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 28.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 21 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2000s 9.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 27.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.56 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2010s 14.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2020s 20.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3014 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Nepal or Romania?
Romania, at 21.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 20.14 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Nepal and Romania?
1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Romania rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Nepal ranks 50th and Romania ranks 49th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Romania: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/romania/">Nepal vs Romania: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.