Namibia vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Namibia
0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.4401 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
132nd
Suriname rank
129th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.4401 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.2386 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 132nd and Suriname ranks 129th of 135 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1662 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0409 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.1367 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2308 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0941 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.1414 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.372 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2305 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.1577 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3537 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.196 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.1893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3487 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1594 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.1845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4353 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2508 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.1758 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4908 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.315 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.4401 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Namibia and Suriname?
0.2386 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Namibia ranks 132nd and Suriname ranks 129th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.