Malawi vs Seychelles: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Malawi
22.88 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
22.24 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
44th
Seychelles rank
46th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Seychelles
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 22.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 22.24 1000 USD per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 0.64 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.

Malawi ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 46th of 135 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Seychelles Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7913 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.393 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
1970s 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
1980s 2.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.61 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 2.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
2010s 12.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.18 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles
2020s 20.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 20.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0208 1000 USD per square kilometre Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Malawi or Seychelles?
Malawi, at 22.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 22.24 1000 USD per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Malawi and Seychelles?
0.64 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Seychelles?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Seychelles rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Malawi ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 46th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Seychelles: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/seychelles/">Malawi vs Seychelles: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.