How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Morocco?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs Morocco: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Lithuania

13 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Morocco

11.37 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania rank

63rd

Morocco rank

66th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Lithuania
Morocco

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 13 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 63rd and Morocco ranks 66th of 135 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1990s	16.8 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.66 1000 USD per square kilometre	11.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	14.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.01 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	14.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	11.17 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.96 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2020s	13.24 1000 USD per square kilometre	12.11 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Lithuania or Morocco?: Lithuania, at 13 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Lithuania and Morocco?: 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Morocco?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Morocco rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Lithuania ranks 63rd and Morocco ranks 66th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Morocco: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/morocco/">Lithuania vs Morocco: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.