Ireland vs Japan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Ireland
109.79 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
102.29 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
8th
Japan rank
10th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Ireland
  • Japan
406080100120196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 109.79 1000 USD per square kilometre against 102.29 1000 USD per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 7.5 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Ireland ranks 8th and Japan ranks 10th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 35.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 43.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1970s 52.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 71.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1980s 68.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 98.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 30.2 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1990s 83.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 102.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.37 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2000s 83.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 95.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2010s 92.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 98.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
2020s 111.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 102.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Ireland or Japan?
Ireland, at 109.79 1000 USD per square kilometre against 102.29 1000 USD per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Ireland and Japan?
7.5 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Japan rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Ireland ranks 8th and Japan ranks 10th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Japan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ireland/japan/">Ireland vs Japan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.