How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Honduras vs Latvia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Honduras

9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

8.5 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Honduras rank

78th

Latvia rank

80th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Honduras
Latvia

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.5 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.74 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Honduras ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 80th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Honduras	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5.34 1000 USD per square kilometre	9.01 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	7.27 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.67 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.602 1000 USD per square kilometre	Honduras
2010s	8.37 1000 USD per square kilometre	8 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3755 1000 USD per square kilometre	Honduras
2020s	9.08 1000 USD per square kilometre	8.55 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5344 1000 USD per square kilometre	Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Honduras or Latvia?: Honduras, at 9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.5 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Honduras and Latvia?: 0.74 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Latvia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Honduras ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 80th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Latvia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/latvia/">Honduras vs Latvia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.