Guyana vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Guyana
0.166 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
133rd
Namibia rank
132nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Guyana
  • Namibia
0.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.166 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.0355 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Guyana ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 132nd of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1285 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 USD per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 0.1593 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1367 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0226 1000 USD per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 0.1059 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1414 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0355 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.132 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1577 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.1561 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0332 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.1424 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0421 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.1421 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1758 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0337 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Guyana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.166 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Guyana and Namibia?
0.0355 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Namibia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Guyana ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 132nd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/namibia/">Guyana vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.