Ecuador vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Ecuador
14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
60th
Thailand rank
59th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Thailand
051015196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.83 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 60th and Thailand ranks 59th of 135 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 3.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.14 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 5.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 8.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 12.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.04 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 13.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.7 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Ecuador or Thailand?
Thailand, at 15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Ecuador and Thailand?
0.83 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Thailand rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Ecuador ranks 60th and Thailand ranks 59th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/thailand/">Ecuador vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.