Ecuador vs Rwanda: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Ecuador
14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
60th
Rwanda rank
57th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Rwanda
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Ecuador ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 135 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2446 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.521 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 3.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 5.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.587 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 8.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8605 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 12.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 18.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 13.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Ecuador or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre against 14.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Ecuador and Rwanda?
1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Ecuador ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Rwanda: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/rwanda/">Ecuador vs Rwanda: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.