Congo vs Mozambique: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Congo
1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
115th
Mozambique rank
117th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Mozambique
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.41 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2965 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2802 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.3587 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3753 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0165 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.4557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0357 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.5583 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6448 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0866 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0.9615 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6394 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3221 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7327 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2868 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Mozambique?
Congo, at 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Mozambique?
0.41 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mozambique: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mozambique/">Congo vs Mozambique: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.