Congo vs Kuwait: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Congo
1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
115th
Kuwait rank
113th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Kuwait
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 115th and Kuwait ranks 113th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Kuwait in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2965 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2653 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0312 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.3587 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.677 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3183 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
1980s 0.4557 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8299 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
1990s 0.5583 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3556 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
2000s 0.9615 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3835 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4569 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1645 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Congo or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Congo and Kuwait?
0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kuwait?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Kuwait rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Congo ranks 115th and Kuwait ranks 113th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kuwait: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kuwait/">Congo vs Kuwait: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.