China vs El Salvador: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

China
43.69 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
41.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
24th
El Salvador rank
26th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
010203040196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 43.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 41.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 26th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.26 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 3.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.05 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 7.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 18.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 25.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.67 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 29.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 35.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.76 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 36.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 40.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 40.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2033 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), China or El Salvador?
China, at 43.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 41.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between China and El Salvador?
2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
China ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 26th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.