How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Chad

2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

111th

Kazakhstan rank

114th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Chad
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Chad currently reports 2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Chad ranks 111th and Kazakhstan ranks 114th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.6326 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7003 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.8328 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7032 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2393 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	2 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1832 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chad or Kazakhstan?: Chad, at 2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chad and Kazakhstan?: 0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Kazakhstan rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Chad ranks 111th and Kazakhstan ranks 114th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/">Chad vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.