Belize vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Belize
3.55 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
105th
Zambia rank
108th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Belize
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 3.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.75 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 108th of 135 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2768 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2515 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0253 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1970s 0.4624 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3919 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0705 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1980s 0.8331 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4563 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3768 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
1990s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6207 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5115 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2000s 2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7124 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2010s 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6002 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize
2020s 3.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7845 1000 USD per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Belize or Zambia?
Belize, at 3.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Belize and Zambia?
0.75 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Zambia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Belize ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 108th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/zambia/">Belize vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.