Barbados vs Malta: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Barbados
199.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
177.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
1st
Malta rank
3rd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 199.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 177.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 22.19 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Barbados ranks 1st and Malta ranks 3rd of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 63.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 102.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 38.57 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
1970s 118.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 154.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 36.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
1980s 165.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 173.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
1990s 169.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 241.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 72.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2000s 172.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 241.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 69.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2010s 198.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 192.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.67 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 189.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 182.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.77 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Barbados or Malta?
Barbados, at 199.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 177.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Barbados and Malta?
22.19 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Barbados ranks 1st and Malta ranks 3rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Malta: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/">Barbados vs Malta: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.