Australia vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Australia
2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
112th
Kazakhstan rank
114th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.15 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Kazakhstan ranks 114th of 135 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2156 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3767 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3403 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1207 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Kazakhstan?
0.15 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 112th and Kazakhstan ranks 114th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.