Australia vs Iceland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Australia
2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
112th
Iceland rank
110th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.3 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 110th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2259 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1172 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1455 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3658 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.257 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4175 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Iceland?
0.3 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 110th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.