Australia vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Australia
2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
112th
Congo rank
115th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 112th and Congo ranks 115th of 135 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2965 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3587 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4557 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5583 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9615 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9512 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3268 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.175 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Australia or Congo?
Australia, at 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Australia and Congo?
0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Australia ranks 112th and Congo ranks 115th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.