Angola vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Angola
0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
134th
Namibia rank
132nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Angola
  • Namibia
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.128 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.7 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 135 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0411 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0842 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0472 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1367 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0896 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0527 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1414 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0888 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1577 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1035 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0622 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1271 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0672 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1173 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0726 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1758 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1031 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Angola or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Angola and Namibia?
0.128 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Namibia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Angola ranks 134th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/namibia/">Angola vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.