How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Malawi

0.1048 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Suriname

0.1053 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malawi rank

87th

Suriname rank

86th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Malawi
Suriname

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.1053 1000 USD per person against 0.1048 1000 USD per person in Malawi, a difference of 0.0005 1000 USD per person.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 86th of 135 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	Suriname	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.018 1000 USD per person	0.0832 1000 USD per person	0.0652 1000 USD per person	Suriname
1970s	0.0251 1000 USD per person	0.0956 1000 USD per person	0.0705 1000 USD per person	Suriname
1980s	0.0255 1000 USD per person	0.1536 1000 USD per person	0.1281 1000 USD per person	Suriname
1990s	0.0243 1000 USD per person	0.1206 1000 USD per person	0.0963 1000 USD per person	Suriname
2000s	0.0249 1000 USD per person	0.1085 1000 USD per person	0.0836 1000 USD per person	Suriname
2010s	0.0678 1000 USD per person	0.1209 1000 USD per person	0.0531 1000 USD per person	Suriname
2020s	0.0982 1000 USD per person	0.1227 1000 USD per person	0.0245 1000 USD per person	Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Malawi or Suriname?: Suriname, at 0.1053 1000 USD per person against 0.1048 1000 USD per person in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Malawi and Suriname?: 0.0005 1000 USD per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Malawi ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 86th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malawi/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malawi/suriname/">Malawi vs Suriname: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,818 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.