How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?

20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0968 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zambia

0.0943 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

93rd

Zambia rank

96th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zambia

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0968 1000 USD per person against 0.0943 1000 USD per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.0025 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 96th of 135 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0937 1000 USD per person	0.0856 1000 USD per person	0.0081 1000 USD per person	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0.1061 1000 USD per person	0.1007 1000 USD per person	0.0054 1000 USD per person	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0.0943 1000 USD per person	0.0922 1000 USD per person	0.002 1000 USD per person	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zambia?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0968 1000 USD per person against 0.0943 1000 USD per person in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?: 0.0025 1000 USD per person, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 96th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/zambia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,818 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.