How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?

29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.0968 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Congo

0.0975 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

93rd

Congo rank

92nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0975 1000 USD per person against 0.0968 1000 USD per person in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Congo ranks 92nd of 135 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0515 1000 USD per person	0.0715 1000 USD per person	0.0201 1000 USD per person	Congo
2000s	0.0768 1000 USD per person	0.0884 1000 USD per person	0.0116 1000 USD per person	Congo
2010s	0.1061 1000 USD per person	0.1124 1000 USD per person	0.0063 1000 USD per person	Congo
2020s	0.0943 1000 USD per person	0.1001 1000 USD per person	0.0059 1000 USD per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?: Congo, at 0.0975 1000 USD per person against 0.0968 1000 USD per person in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Congo ranks 92nd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,818 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.