Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Suriname
1.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.5154 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
136th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.5154 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 3.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 137 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.669 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3102 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3588 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.9301 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4647 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4653 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 1.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5002 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 1.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4999 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9236 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 1.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4888 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8601 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 1.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.484 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 1.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4976 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Suriname, at 1.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.5154 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
1.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Suriname ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.