Iceland vs Nicaragua: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Iceland
288.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
284.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
54th
Nicaragua rank
55th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Iceland
  • Nicaragua
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 288.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 284.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 3.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 54th and Nicaragua ranks 55th of 137 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 198.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre 54.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre 143.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 215.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 93.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 122.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 216.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 60.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 155.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 188.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre 70.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 226.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 137.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 89.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 275.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre 225.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 289.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 285.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Iceland or Nicaragua?
Iceland, at 288.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 284.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Iceland and Nicaragua?
3.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Nicaragua rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Iceland ranks 54th and Nicaragua ranks 55th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Nicaragua: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nicaragua/">Iceland vs Nicaragua: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.