Hungary vs Rwanda: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Hungary
7,376 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
11,857 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
13th
Rwanda rank
10th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Hungary
  • Rwanda
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 11,857 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7,376 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 4,481 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 7,018 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,385 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,633 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 9,464 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,099 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,365 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 12,376 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,620 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,756 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 9,340 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,068 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 7,929 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,055 1000 SLC per square kilometre 874.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 6,994 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,691 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,696 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 7,358 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,879 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,521 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Hungary or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 11,857 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7,376 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Hungary and Rwanda?
4,481 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Hungary ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Rwanda: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/hungary/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/hungary/rwanda/">Hungary vs Rwanda: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.