Egypt vs Morocco: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Egypt
110.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
105.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
71st
Morocco rank
74th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Egypt
  • Morocco
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 110.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 105.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 5.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Egypt ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 74th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 20.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 26.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 27.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 34.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 56.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 52.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 85.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 68.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 101.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre 103.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 113.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 111.99 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Egypt or Morocco?
Egypt, at 110.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 105.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Egypt and Morocco?
5.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Morocco rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Egypt ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 74th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Morocco: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/morocco/">Egypt vs Morocco: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.