Chile vs Pakistan: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Chile
3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
5,550 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
17th
Pakistan rank
14th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chile
  • Pakistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 5,550 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1,699 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 966.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 475.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre 491.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1970s 1,141 1000 SLC per square kilometre 614.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre 526.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1,464 1000 SLC per square kilometre 914.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre 549.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1990s 2,290 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,704 1000 SLC per square kilometre 585.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,536 1000 SLC per square kilometre 665.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 3,733 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,118 1000 SLC per square kilometre 384.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 3,933 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,247 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,314 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Chile or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 5,550 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Chile and Pakistan?
1,699 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Chile ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Pakistan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/pakistan/">Chile vs Pakistan: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.