Chile vs Mauritius: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Chile
3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
2,650 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
17th
Mauritius rank
20th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2,650 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 1,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 137 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 966.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 434.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre 532.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1970s 1,141 1000 SLC per square kilometre 502.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 638.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1,464 1000 SLC per square kilometre 620.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 844.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1990s 2,290 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,001 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,288 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,732 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,469 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 3,733 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,175 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,558 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 3,933 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,399 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,534 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 3,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2,650 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Chile and Mauritius?
1,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.