Canada vs Namibia: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Canada
3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
130th
Namibia rank
131st

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Canada
  • Namibia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Canada ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 131st of 137 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.008 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1970s 1.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0318 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1980s 1.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0833 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1990s 2.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.001 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2000s 2.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0985 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2010s 2.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1434 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2020s 3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7624 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Canada or Namibia?
Canada, at 3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Canada and Namibia?
0.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Canada ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 131st of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/canada/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/canada/namibia/">Canada vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.