Australia vs Canada: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Australia
2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
132nd
Canada rank
130th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
0123196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 132nd and Canada ranks 130th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Canada in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 1.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1305 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1970s 2.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2639 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1980s 2.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1304 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 2.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3655 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2000s 2.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1217 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2010s 2.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0143 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2020s 2.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5791 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 3.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Australia and Canada?
0.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Australia ranks 132nd and Canada ranks 130th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
137 places, 7,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.