Nepal vs New Caledonia: Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … SLC annual growth rate

Nepal
4.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia
5.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal rank
30th
New Caledonia rank
27th

Livestock: Gross Production Value (constant) … SLC annual growth rate over time

  • Nepal
  • New Caledonia
-20-1001020196219932024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 5.02 % change on previous year against 4.14 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0.88 % change on previous year.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 30th and New Caledonia ranks 27th of 157 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.36 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year 0.256 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1970s 2.89 % change on previous year 4.57 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s 3.04 % change on previous year 5.22 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 1.83 % change on previous year 3.13 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 2.76 % change on previous year 0.4908 % change on previous year 2.27 % change on previous year Nepal
2010s 4.36 % change on previous year 3.54 % change on previous year 0.8222 % change on previous year Nepal
2020s 4.35 % change on previous year 1.79 % change on previous year 2.55 % change on previous year Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), Nepal or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 5.02 % change on previous year against 4.14 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc) between Nepal and New Caledonia?
0.88 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Nepal and New Caledonia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc)?
Nepal ranks 30th and New Caledonia ranks 27th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs New Caledonia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-annual-growth-rate/nepal/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-annual-growth-rate/nepal/new-caledonia/">Nepal vs New Caledonia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,980 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.