Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Saudi Arabia
2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
141st
Zambia rank
142nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zambia
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 142nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.1332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.3681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.5611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5953 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0342 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0379 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 2.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1978 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Saudi Arabia or Zambia?
Saudi Arabia, at 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zambia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Saudi Arabia ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 142nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/zambia/">Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.