Malawi vs Puerto Rico: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Malawi
19.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
19.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
47th
Puerto Rico rank
48th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Puerto Rico
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 19.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Malawi ranks 47th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 171 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 39.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 43.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 43.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 3.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 9.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 17.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Malawi or Puerto Rico?
Malawi, at 19.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Malawi and Puerto Rico?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Puerto Rico?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Puerto Rico rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Malawi ranks 47th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Puerto Rico: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/malawi/puerto-rico-us/">Malawi vs Puerto Rico: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.