Lithuania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Lithuania
18.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
21.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
49th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
46th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Trinidad and Tobago
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 21.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 49th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 46th of 171 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 25.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 21.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 20.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 19.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Lithuania or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 21.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago?
3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Lithuania ranks 49th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 46th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/trinidad-and-tobago/">Lithuania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.