Eswatini vs Senegal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Eswatini
6.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
6.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
106th
Senegal rank
108th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Senegal
0246196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 6.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 0.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 106th and Senegal ranks 108th of 171 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 4.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 5.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 5.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 5.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 5.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Senegal?
Eswatini, at 6.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Senegal?
0.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Senegal rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 106th and Senegal ranks 108th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Senegal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/senegal/">Eswatini vs Senegal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.