Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Ecuador
15.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
14.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
59th
Sri Lanka rank
60th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sri Lanka
051015196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 15.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 14.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Ecuador ranks 59th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 3.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 6.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3883 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 13.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 13.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
Ecuador, at 15.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 14.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Ecuador ranks 59th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sri-lanka/">Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.