Congo vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Congo
0.5118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.4509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
165th
Namibia rank
166th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.5118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Congo ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 166th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2804 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.1403 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.1741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3702 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1961 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.2927 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.4848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.5021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 0.5118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Congo and Namibia?
0.0609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Congo ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 166th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.