Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Colombia
10.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
80th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
246810196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 10.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 3.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 4.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 5.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 7.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 9.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 10.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Colombia, at 10.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
0.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Colombia ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.