China vs Portugal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China
33.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
31.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
31st
Portugal rank
33rd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China
  • Portugal
0102030196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 33.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 31.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

China ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 33rd of 171 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 5.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 14.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 22.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 28.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 31.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Portugal?
China, at 33.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 31.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Portugal?
1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Portugal rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Portugal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/portugal/">China vs Portugal: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.