Burundi vs Qatar: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Burundi
7.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
8.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
93rd
Qatar rank
91st

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Burundi
  • Qatar
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 8.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 93rd and Qatar ranks 91st of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 6 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 2.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 3.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 3.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6732 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 3.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 6.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9513 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 7.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Burundi or Qatar?
Qatar, at 8.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Burundi and Qatar?
0.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Qatar rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Burundi ranks 93rd and Qatar ranks 91st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Qatar: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burundi/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burundi/qatar/">Burundi vs Qatar: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.