Burkina Faso vs Chile: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Burkina Faso
6.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
6.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
101st
Chile rank
104th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Chile
02468196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 6.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Chile ranks 104th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.8549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 3.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 5.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 7.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 6.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Burkina Faso or Chile?
Burkina Faso, at 6.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Burkina Faso and Chile?
0.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Chile ranks 104th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chile: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/chile/">Burkina Faso vs Chile: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.