Botswana vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Botswana
0.747 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
162nd
Mali rank
159th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Mali
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.747 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.2087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.

Botswana ranks 162nd and Mali ranks 159th of 171 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1970s 0.4095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0762 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1980s 0.4549 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1990s 0.4691 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2000s 0.4393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 0.6275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 0.7514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1924 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Botswana or Mali?
Mali, at 0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.747 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Botswana and Mali?
0.2087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mali rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Botswana ranks 162nd and Mali ranks 159th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mali/">Botswana vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.