Bhutan vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Bhutan
0.9221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
160th
Oman rank
157th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Oman
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 160th and Oman ranks 157th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Oman in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.6067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.7928 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.4181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.4073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.7355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bhutan or Oman?
Oman, at 0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bhutan and Oman?
0.0564 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Oman?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Oman rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bhutan ranks 160th and Oman ranks 157th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oman/">Bhutan vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.