Austria vs Poland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Austria
45.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
53.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
20th
Poland rank
18th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Austria
  • Poland
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 53.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 45.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 7.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Austria ranks 20th and Poland ranks 18th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 33.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1970s 38.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 45.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 44.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 46.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1990s 43.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2000s 43.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 46.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 47.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 47.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Austria or Poland?
Poland, at 53.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 45.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Austria and Poland?
7.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Austria and Poland rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Austria ranks 20th and Poland ranks 18th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Poland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/poland/">Austria vs Poland: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.