Argentina vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Argentina
9.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
80th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Zimbabwe
246810196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 5.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 6.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 7.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1335 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 8.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 9.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1167 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Argentina or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Argentina and Zimbabwe?
0.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Argentina ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zimbabwe/">Argentina vs Zimbabwe: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.