Angola vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Angola
1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
156th
Oman rank
157th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Angola
  • Oman
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0.1215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 156th and Oman ranks 157th of 171 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1735 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0.3082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.3721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.4687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 0.6326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.8576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Angola or Oman?
Angola, at 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Angola and Oman?
0.1215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Oman?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Oman rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Angola ranks 156th and Oman ranks 157th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/oman/">Angola vs Oman: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.