Angola vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Angola
1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
156th
Mali rank
159th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Angola
  • Mali
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.1443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.

Angola ranks 156th and Mali ranks 159th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1970s 0.3082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1775 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1980s 0.3721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
1990s 0.4687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5921 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2000s 0.6326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 0.8576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0799 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Angola or Mali?
Angola, at 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Angola and Mali?
0.1443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Mali rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Angola ranks 156th and Mali ranks 159th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/mali/">Angola vs Mali: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.