Algeria vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Algeria
2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
143rd
Zambia rank
142nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Algeria
  • Zambia
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Algeria, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 142nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2418 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2515 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.3897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
1980s 0.6528 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
1990s 0.9064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5953 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
2000s 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
2010s 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2416 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria
2020s 2.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2518 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Algeria or Zambia?
Zambia, at 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Algeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Algeria and Zambia?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Zambia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Algeria ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 142nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/algeria/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/algeria/zambia/">Algeria vs Zambia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.